Case Study 02
Value-Stream Design

~475 Recurring Retrieval Errors per Month to Zero at the July 2024 Report-Out

Measured for the defined material classes in scope: cartridges, bottles and lids. A large new automated warehouse was coming online, and the flow was redesigned before the layout was locked rather than after.

A "snatch-and-grab" is a recurring, unplanned retrieval of specific material classes to correct a point-of-use shortage.

~450,000 sq. ft.New capacity coming online, client-reported
~475 / monthBaseline, cartridges, bottles and lids
0At the July 2024 report-out, same scope
Client
A global confectionery and food manufacturer
Service
Value stream mapping and flow design
Status
Anonymized case study

The Strategic Problem

Expansion Amplifies Whatever Operating System Already Exists.

A capital project of this scale does one of two things. It relieves pressure on the network, or it hard-codes the current operating logic into a permanently larger asset. Which one it does is determined by how material is designed to flow, not by the square footage. The prevailing state included roughly 475 recurring retrieval errors a month across the material classes in scope.

Exhibit 1 · Two Paths Through the Same New Capacity
Operating model
Without redesign
Current operating system
Large new warehouse comes online
More volume and complexity
Existing failure modes scale
The engagement
Current-state diagnosis
Future-state flow design
Layout and automation choices made against it
~475 snatch-and-grab retrievals per month to 0 at the July 2024 report-out

The redesign connected new capacity to a more reliable material flow. The retrieval figure covers cartridges, bottles and lids only, and is stated as of the July 2024 report-out.

The most important time to redesign flow is not when a business is cutting. It is when a business is growing.

The Baseline

A Recurring Retrieval Error, Repeating Roughly 475 Times a Month.

One defined defect interrupted planned capacity roughly 475 times a month across three material classes. The loop below shows how a single retrieval event consumed planned capacity.

Exhibit 2 · The Failure Loop
01Production plan in place
02Material not available at point of use
03Shortage identified at the line
04Planned work interrupted
05Material located elsewhere
06Unplanned retrieval performed
07Material expedited to the line
08Schedule disruption absorbed downstream
Loop repeats ~475 × per month cartridges, bottles and lids

The loop shows how a point-of-use shortage interrupted planned capacity and forced an unplanned retrieval.

Whatever generated those events was the operating logic about to be installed in a facility several times larger.

The Intervention

Incito Redesigned the Flow Before the Layout Was Locked.

Three end-to-end value streams were mapped under the signed statement of work, and the resulting design informed layout and automation choices before that spend was committed. On the floor, the work included a zoned redesign in Zone 4.

Exhibit 3 · The Redesign Sequence
01

See

Current-state flow observed as material actually moved.

02

Diagnose

Failure points located against inventory and retrieval data.

03

Design

Future state designed around the new capacity, not transferred into it.

04

Implement

Design converted into a zoned redesign on the warehouse floor.

05

Hand over

Method transferred to client teams and embedded in the client's own supply excellence program.

The five-step deployment connected strategy alignment, three end-to-end value stream maps, Kaizen and high-impact events, a deep-dive inventory review with 3P design and automation roadmap, and the Zone 4 redesign.

3Value streams mapped
Zone 4Zoned redesign on the floor
CompleteAt the report-out, some adjacent items open
Any consultancy can map a value stream. The difference is designing the operating flow while the layout can still change.

How the Result Was Built to Last

Designed to Run With the Client's Own Teams.

The reduction came from redesigned work that made the old failure mode hard to reproduce, not from oversight. Four choices in how the engagement was run were designed to keep the new flow inside the client's own teams.

Cross-functional design

The people who moved, stored, scheduled and consumed the material mapped the value stream together, producing one shared operating reality.

Real operating data

Inventory and retrieval records grounded the diagnosis, so the future state was argued from evidence rather than preference.

Go to the process

Mapping happened where material actually moved, so the design had to survive contact with the floor before it earned implementation.

Method transfer

Client teams implemented the new flow, and the value stream mapping method was embedded in the client's own supply excellence program.

The result shown is the July 2024 report-out state for cartridges, bottles and lids.
A result imposed from outside leaves with the people who imposed it. A method embedded in the client's own program does not.

Results

New Capacity Designed Without Importing the Disruption Cost.

Exhibit 4 · Recurring Retrieval Errors per Month
Baseline to July 2024
Baseline
~475
July 2024
0

100% elimination at the July 2024 report-out, for cartridges, bottles and lids

For cartridges, bottles and lids, recurring retrieval errors fell from roughly 475 per month to zero at the July 2024 report-out.
Trigger
~450,000 sq. ft.Client-reported, coming online
Scope
3 value streamsThree value streams mapped
Implementation
Zone 4 completeSome adjacent items remained open
The defect the engagement targeted was gone at the report-out, and the new capacity was designed around the redesigned flow rather than the old one.

Executive Implication

Before You Add Capacity, Determine What You Are About to Scale.

Each of the following is a point at which the existing operating logic is either redesigned or permanently replicated.

New facility
The flow gets built into the building on day one.
Capacity expansion
More volume through the same logic multiplies its waste.
Acquisition integration
Two operating logics collide, and one gets institutionalized.
Network consolidation
Several sites become fewer, concentrating flow and flow failure.
Distribution expansion
New nodes inherit the current state unless it is redesigned.
Rapid scale
Growth outruns the operating system's ability to absorb it.
Planning a major capacity change?

Talk with Incito before the flow gets built into the facility.

Incito Consulting Group · Case Study 02 · Confectionery and Food All case studies
Schedule a Call